AEO Checker Free Tool
Score how ready your content is to get cited by ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and Google's AI overviews - 12 questions, 3 minutes, and the specific fixes for your weakest area. No signup, no email gate.
๐ก Information gain
Does your content include data, numbers, or screenshots nobody else has?
Your own analytics, benchmarks, pricing you collected, real campaign results.
Does it take a clear position or share firsthand experience?
"We tried this and here's what happened" beats a neutral summary of the top 10 results.
Would an expert learn something new from it?
If it could be reconstructed from the current SERP, an LLM has no reason to cite you over anyone else.
๐งฑ Structure & schema
Does each page answer its core question directly in the first ~100 words?
LLMs and featured snippets both reward an immediate, quotable answer.
Do you use proper H1/H2 structure, FAQs, and descriptive titles?
One H1, question-shaped H2s, an on-page FAQ that mirrors real queries.
Do your pages ship structured data (FAQ, Article, HowTo schema)?
JSON-LD makes your answers machine-readable - check with Google's Rich Results test.
๐ Authority & citations
Is a real, named person with expertise attached to your content?
Author bylines with titles and LinkedIn profiles - LLMs weight identifiable experts.
Is your brand present where LLMs look - LinkedIn, YouTube, Reddit, listicles?
LinkedIn is now a top-2 most-cited domain on LLMs; being discussed there matters.
Do other sites in your niche mention or link to you?
Not bulk backlinks - genuine mentions in roundups, comparisons, and communities.
๐ค AI crawler access
Does your robots.txt allow AI crawlers (GPTBot, ClaudeBot, PerplexityBot)?
Many sites blocked them by default in 2023-24 and forgot - blocked means never cited.
Does your key content render without JavaScript?
Most AI crawlers read server-rendered HTML; content that only appears client-side is invisible to them.
Are your pages fast, indexed, and in a clean sitemap?
Basic technical SEO still gates everything - if Google can't crawl it, neither can anyone else.
Why AI-search readiness is worth 3 minutes
A growing share of B2B buying research now happens inside ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, and AI overviews instead of a results page. The clicks that survive are worth more: in our own analytics, visitors referred by AI assistants convert at a 26.3% key event rate versus 4.4% from organic search - about 6x. Someone arriving from an AI recommendation was already told you're the answer.
The scoring above reflects what actually drives citations: content only you could publish, structured so a machine can lift the answer, attached to a credible named human, on a site AI crawlers are allowed to read. (That last one bites more companies than you'd think - we've audited sites wondering why AI never mentions them while their robots.txt blocked every AI crawler.)
Frequently Asked Questions
Raise the score
The checker finds the gaps. These close them.
B2B SEO Strategy โ
The information-gain content engine that wins Google and LLM citations at once.
B2B Content Marketing Guide โ
Every channel that works in 2026, including the full AEO/GEO playbook.
SEO ROI Calculator โ
Decide which posts are worth writing before you write them.
Social Selling Tools โ
Why LinkedIn became a top-2 most-cited domain on LLMs - and how to use it.
LinkedIn SSI Scorer โ
The same 3-minute self-assessment format, for your LinkedIn presence.
All Free Tools โ
The full Postbeam tool directory.
Publish the content AI actually cites
Postbeam turns your calls, docs, and expertise into information-gain blog posts and LinkedIn content - built to win Google, ChatGPT, and Claude traffic.